FrameLab

    Should our client acquire this company?

    An acquisition is justified if what the client gets is worth more than what it pays. To judge that, you need to understand why it wants to buy, what the target is worth as it stands, what the combination really adds, and what can go wrong after signing.

    What the interviewer is assessing

    • That you ask for the rationale. Buying to gain market share, to acquire a technology or to establish a presence in a country is not judged by the same criteria.
    • That you separate the standalone value of the target from the value created by combining. Synergies are where acquisitions are won or lost, and they are almost always overestimated.
    • That you talk about price. An excellent company bought too dear is a bad acquisition.
    • That you raise integration and alternatives. Could the client reach the same goal through a partnership or by growing on its own?

    How to build your answer

    1. 1

      Clarify the purpose of the deal

      Ask what the client wants out of this deal and why now. That tells you what to look at first.
    2. 2

      Assess the target and its market

      Is the target's market healthy and growing? Is the target well placed in it, profitable, and what does its performance rest on: a few customers, key people, a patent?
    3. 3

      Quantify synergies cautiously

      Separate cost synergies (purchasing, sites, duplicated functions), which are safer, from revenue synergies (cross-selling), which are less certain. Think of losses too: customers leaving, integration costs.
    4. 4

      Compare with the price and weigh the risks

      Does the target's value plus realistic synergies exceed the asking price? Finish with integration risks, alternatives, and a recommendation with its conditions.

    How a good answer starts

    "Our client, a group of veterinary clinics, is looking at buying a regional network of about thirty clinics. Before structuring, I would like to understand the motivation: is it mainly trying to get bigger to negotiate its purchasing better, or to establish itself in a region where it is absent?

    I suggest four areas. The first is the target itself: the health of its clinics, their profitability, and what could weaken that profitability after the deal. I am thinking in particular of vets leaving, since in this business customers often follow the practitioner. The second is what the combination brings: savings on medicines and equipment, and perhaps shared services. The third is the asking price, to compare with the target's value plus those gains. The last covers integration risks and the alternative, which would be opening its own clinics in the region..."

    This example is made up: it shows the tone and the construction, not a script to memorise. Your answer has to come from your own experience or from the data the interviewer gives you.

    Common mistakes

    • Analysing the target as in a profitability case and forgetting the question asked, which is a decision to buy at a given price.
    • Listing synergies without quantifying them or separating the likely from the hoped-for.
    • Not mentioning integration. Different cultures, systems to merge, key people leaving: that is where much of the value is lost.
    • Forgetting that not buying, or reaching the goal another way, is one of the options.

    Follow-ups to expect

    "What is the maximum price the client should accept?"

    Reason from the target's standalone value plus the share of synergies you find realistic, and explain why the buyer should not hand all the synergies to the seller.

    "What are the main integration risks?"

    Give two or three specific to the industry in the case, each with a concrete measure to reduce it.

    "What if a competitor buys the target instead?"

    Assess what that would change for the client's position. This scenario can justify paying a little more, or reveal that the stakes are defensive.

    Frequently asked questions

    Do I need to know how to do a valuation in a consulting interview?

    Rarely in detail. What is expected is order-of-magnitude reasoning: an annual profit, a multiple or a payback period given by the interviewer, and the comparison with the price. Detailed financial modelling belongs more to banking interviews.

    What is the difference between cost and revenue synergies?

    Cost synergies come from what is removed or shared, and depend mostly on the client. Revenue synergies assume customers will buy more, which depends on them. The former are therefore more reliable, and a good candidate says so.

    Read next

    Answer this question out loud with an AI interviewer