A private equity fund is considering buying this company: is it a good investment?
A fund buys in order to sell for more a few years later. So the question is not whether the company is good, but whether it will be worth clearly more at exit than at entry. The answer rests on four points: how sound the market is, the target's position, what the fund can improve while it owns it, and the price paid relative to resale value.
What the interviewer is assessing
- That you take the investor's point of view. A fund has no industrial synergies to count on: it earns through profit growth, debt paydown and sometimes a sale at a better multiple.
- That you look for what could break the thesis. Due diligence is as much about finding reasons not to buy as about confirming the deal's appeal.
- That you think about the exit from the start: who will buy this company in five years, and why would they pay more?
- That you can work out a simple return on investment from a few figures.
How to build your answer
- 1
Understand the fund's thesis
What attracts it to this target, how long does it plan to hold it, and what return is it aiming for? - 2
Judge the market and the target's position
Is the market growing, is it exposed to disruption or to a cycle? Is the target protected by something durable, and is its revenue recurring or concentrated in a few customers? - 3
Identify the value creation levers
What the fund can do in a few years: speed up growth, improve margins, buy small competitors to gain scale. Separate the probable from the possible. - 4
Compare price with exit value and list the risks
Estimate profit at exit, resale value and the return that represents. End with the two or three risks that would make the thesis fail.
How a good answer starts
"If I understand correctly, our client is a fund looking at buying a publisher of practice management software for dental surgeries, and it wants to know whether to make an offer. One clarification to start: does it have a holding period and a target return in mind?
I would look at four things. First the market: the number of surgeries, how many are equipped, and above all how easily a surgery switches software, because if customers rarely leave, revenue is very predictable, which is exactly what a fund looks for. Then the target: its market share, the proportion of revenue that comes from subscriptions, and any dependence on a few key people. Then what the fund could improve in five years, for example selling extra modules to existing customers or buying small publishers. Finally the asking price, which I would compare with what the company could be worth at resale. My first question is about the customer churn rate..."
This example is made up: it shows the tone and the construction, not a script to memorise. Your answer has to come from your own experience or from the data the interviewer gives you.
Common mistakes
- Treating the case as an industrial acquisition and looking for synergies, when a fund generally has no business to combine with the target.
- Concluding on the quality of the company without mentioning price or return.
- Forgetting the exit. Without a plausible buyer in a few years, the value created stays on paper.
- Presenting only the reasons to buy. A good candidate actively looks for what could go wrong.
Follow-ups to expect
"The fund pays a given amount today and expects to sell for double in five years. What is the annual return?"
Doubling in five years is a little under 15% a year. The rule of 72 gives the reference: 72 divided by the number of years.
"Which risk worries you most?"
Pick one, specific to the target, and say what check you would run to clear it before signing.
Frequently asked questions
What is a commercial due diligence case?
It is the analysis a consulting firm carries out for an investor before a buyout: how sound the market is, the company's position, how credible its business plan is. It complements the financial and legal analyses done by other advisers.
Do I need to know how a leveraged buyout works?
The outline is enough: the fund finances part of the price with debt, which the company repays out of its profits. That raises the return on the equity invested but makes the company fragile if revenue falls, which is why steady revenue matters so much.